The documentary 'Ghost in the Machine,' featured at Sundance, asserts that the drive toward artificial intelligence and the broader Silicon Valley ecosystem stem from eugenics principles.
Filmmaker Valerie Veatch contends that elements of techno-fascism promoted by figures such as Elon Musk and Peter Thiel represent an inherent aspect rather than an unintended flaw. Though this perspective might appear exaggerated, the movie, constructed from discussions with experts in philosophy, AI development, history, and computing, offers compelling evidence that resists skepticism.
For audiences already tracking the rapid advancement of AI or the dynamics of Silicon Valley, Veatch's systematic breakdown of the sector's foundations may not introduce groundbreaking revelations. The production opens with the notorious collapse of Microsoft's Tay chatbot, which quickly devolved into endorsing Hitler and white supremacy. It also examines the ecological consequences of AI data centers alongside the dependence of technology firms on underpaid labor from regions like Africa to refine their systems.
One unexpected revelation involves linking tech's eugenic influences directly to Karl Pearson, the statistician who helped establish modern statistics while dedicating his career to measuring supposed racial disparities—and who regarded one race as dominant. Pearson's ideas persisted through William Shockley, who co-invented the transistor and openly advocated white supremacist views, including now-discredited claims about IQ and racial variances in his final years.
During his tenure as a Stanford engineering instructor, Shockley cultivated an environment that favored white males at the expense of women and underrepresented groups, thereby influencing the demographic makeup of contemporary Silicon Valley. Such ideologies may have affected John McCarthy, the Stanford scholar who introduced the phrase 'artificial intelligence' in 1955.
Given this historical backdrop, Elon Musk—frequently criticized for online discriminatory remarks, allegations of fostering racial bias at Tesla, and gestures interpreted as Nazi salutes—emerges not as an outlier but as a continuation of longstanding trends. The film poses a straightforward inquiry: Why entrust the trajectory of society to individuals resembling Musk, who are predominantly men of similar profile?
Drawing from conversations with specialists including AI expert Dr. Emily Bender, historian Becca Lewis, and media scholar Douglass Rushkoff, 'Ghost in the Machine' portrays the expansion of AI as an authoritarian initiative designed to undermine human dignity and position a technological upper class as unchallenged authorities. With daily existence increasingly shaped by devices and platforms from corporations that emphasize user retention through addictive features rather than well-being, the prospect of AI perpetuating such cycles feels plausible.
The documentary sidesteps any exploration of AI's possible advantages, potentially prompting supporters to label it as biased advocacy. Yet, as AI enthusiasm reaches its zenith—following massive investments exceeding hundreds of billions by major tech entities and aggressive promotion without demonstrating widespread practical value—the field ought to endure scrutiny.
'Ghost in the Machine' can be accessed via the Sundance Film Festival's platform and compatible streaming services starting today and continuing until Sunday, February 1.
Purchases made via links in this piece may generate affiliate revenue.