Reddit has initiated legal proceedings in Australia's High Court to challenge the nation's prohibition on social media access for those under 16, according to Reuters. The online discussion site contends that the legislation violates the Australian constitution by limiting political speech. Furthermore, it claims exclusion from the rule since it does not qualify as a social media service under the statute's criteria. This move is expected to spark an extended court dispute, bolstered by Reddit's financial strength and significant user base in the country.
The global pioneering restriction on social media for minors under 16 took effect on December 10 in Australia. Ten services, among them Reddit, are required to prevent access by users below that age or risk penalties reaching A$49.5 million, equivalent to $33 million. Companies are employing diverse verification techniques, such as analyzing user behavior for age estimates and requiring facial images.
In its court submission, Reddit highlighted major concerns regarding user privacy and the freedom of political speech under the regulation. It pointed out that individuals in Australia below 16 will soon qualify as voters, with their decisions shaped by interactions in political discussions before turning 18.
Australian officials countered that Reddit's suit prioritizes financial gains over safeguarding young people's expressive freedoms. Health Minister Mark Butler compared the resistance to historical opposition from the tobacco industry against regulatory measures, describing it as a recurring tactic from large social media and technology firms.
Boasting a $44 billion valuation, Reddit possesses ample resources for a prolonged litigation effort. Its incentive is heightened by Australia's status as the platform's fourth-biggest market, trailing only Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.