Several nations are implementing restrictions on social media access for individuals younger than 16, yet new survey data challenges the real-world impact of these regulations. The Molly Rose Foundation, an organization dedicated to curbing digital risks, conducted a survey in March involving 1,050 Australian youths aged 12 to 15. Findings revealed that 61% of respondents in this age group, who had prior exposure to restricted social media services, continue to maintain at least one operational profile on those sites.
Australia pioneered a global precedent by prohibiting social media use for anyone under 16, with the rule taking effect on December 10. Although the measure has been active for just several months, the foundation's analysis determined no evident beneficial or detrimental effect on youth mental health. Additionally, 70% of the young participants attempting to access blocked platforms reported that circumventing the restriction was straightforward.
"The findings cast significant doubt on the ban's success in Australia and highlight the substantial risks involved if the UK decides to adopt a similar policy," stated Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation.
In March, the Australian authorities released their assessment of how social media companies are adhering to the prohibition. The evaluation identified ongoing probes into Snap, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube regarding possible violations. The eSafety commissioner is wrapping up these reviews and anticipates resolving enforcement actions by mid-2026. Per the eSafety assessment, available remedies encompass issuing fines, pursuing judicial blocks, and imposing civil fines reaching A$49.5 million, equivalent to approximately $35 million in U.S. dollars.